Thursday, April 30, 2009

Gunman Opens Fire in Rotterdam Cafe

A gunman has opened fire in a busy cafe in Holland, killing one person and injuring three others, police have said.

The man attacked customers in the premises and then ran outside where he shot at bystanders on the street.

A police spokesman said people outside the cafe wrestled the gunman to the ground and held him until officers arrived.

The motive for the shooting, which happened in the early hours in Rotterdam, is not yet known.
But it may have begun with an argument in the cafe, where a talent contest was taking place.
One person was wounded inside the premises and three people were hit on the street, one fatally, the police spokesman said.

Officers said the man was a 46-year-old resident of the city but gave no further details.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

More Examples of Armed Homeowner Confrontations

In regards to Sunday's post (below) on what to do when confronting a bad guy in your house when you are armed, here's some additional examples of what can happen. My contention is that you are placing yourself at a huge tactical disadvantage if you try to disarm or detain a bad guy. In reality, you are going to have very little control of an intruder, even if you hold them at gun point.

In Sunday's post, I gave some examples of things that can (and have) happened when a homeowner confronts the bad guy. After a very quick and informal look, I found some additional real-life examples. All of these happened during the months of January and February of this year in the U.S.

Case 1 – Homeowner and wife are awakened by their barking dogs in the middle of the night. An intruder has gained entry through the home's sliding glass doors. Homeowner arms himself with a .38 caliber revolver and stays in his bedroom with his wife. A masked intruder began to enter the bedroom and, almost simultaneously, homeowner and intruder exchange shots. Intruder hit, homeowner not hit.

Case 2 – Homeowner pulls into his driveway and witnesses a burglar is carrying homeowner's possessions out the back door. Homeowner challenges bad guy. Bad guy draws a knife and slashes the homeowner. A wrestling match ensues which ends up in the homeowner's swimming pool (this is in February b-r-r-r-r). Homeowner manages to get out of the pool and retrieve a rifle (the account does not detail from where) and holds the burglar at gunpoint until police arrive.

Case 3 – A woman and her children are in their apartment when a man breaks in. She takes her children and retreats to the bedroom, locks the door behind her and retrieves a handgun. When the intruder tries to get into the bedroom, she fires one shot. Intruder is found suffering from a gunshot wound outside the apartment complex by police.

Case 4 – Homeowner comes home and finds a burglar carrying homeowner's possessions (similar to Case 2). Homeowner reaches into his pickup truck and retrieves a .22 caliber rifle and challenges to burglar to put the stolen goods down. Burglar panics, runs back into the house where he slips on the linoleum tile and falls. This allows the homeowner to hold the bad guy at gunpoint until police arrive.

Case 5 – Homeowner is awakened in the middle of the night by a noise downstairs. He retrieves his semi-automatic handgun from his bedside nightstand. He goes downstairs to investigate and finds himself in a confrontation with 3 intruders. The homeowner fires "several" shots causing the bad guys to flee the house. Later it is determined that one of the intruders was hit.

Five different cases. Because we were looking for information on confronting a bad guy in your home while you are armed, by definition they have many similarities. But what is striking to me is the crazy kinds of situations that can unfold. A wrestling match that ends up in a swimming pool? A guy slipping and falling the tile floor? In 2 of these cases no shots are fired and the bad guy complies with the homeowner's demands. Note that both of these scenarios (Case 2 and Case 4) involve a strict "burglar" who is robbing an unoccupied home. When confronted, they complied. However, the "intruders" who invade an occupied home (Cases 1, 3, and 5) have a different mind set, a more predatory mind set. In these cases, it appears that they pressed the confrontation with the homeowners. Don't assume that someone who has the mind set to break into your home when you are home will be deterred by threats alone. You must be prepared to access different levels of force options to protect yourself and your family.

The case that is most like the course of action recommended in Sunday's post is Case 1. The homeowner did not give up his strong tactical position (he stayed in his bedroom). This allowed him to control the doorway (a fatal funnel) and to shield and protect his wife. Presumably they had access to a phone while defending the bedroom and were calling 911.

Remember, our strategy is to gain and maintain a position of tactical dominance.

Labels: ,

Sunday, April 26, 2009

He's in My Home, How do I Safely Disarm Him?

Q: I now have a handgun for home protection.  (Been burglarized twice).

 

What I would like to know is if I come upon someone in my home, I have my gun on him/her, announce myself and for them to freeze, how then do I disarm and detain them SAFELY while my heart is racing a mile a minute?


A: To make sure I get your scenario, you say "come upon someone in my home".  That could be because you've come home from being gone or you either intentionally or unintentionally encountered them while you were in your home.


Here's your main principle to follow: You should seek to gain and maintain a position of tactical dominance.


I don't see my immediate objective as "disarming" or "detaining" anyone.  You and I are not going to act as a cop here.  I'm more interested in controlling my space and my environment to keep the bad guy from hurting or killing me or my family.


If I'm coming home, I might feel that backing out of the house while covering him is my best choice.  If I'm already home, I'm going to cover the area that has my family or move to get my family into an area behind me while I cover the approach.


It's important to note here that in most -- if not all -- states you cannot use deadly force (shoot someone) to protect property (with the exception of someone preparing to burn an occupied building).  You can threaten to use deadly force, but you cannot actually use it.  "But, Brad, he's in my house! Can't I legally shoot him?"  That's a complicated question and the answer is "it depends".  Most of the time the answer is actually no (you can see some additional thoughts here at http://www.defendu.com/questions/quest56.htm).


Figure out where your safest and tactically sound areas of your house are.  In the story linked to above, I intend to control a hallway or staircase for my position of tactical dominance.


You are right, your heart will be RACING!  As your heart rate increases, your fine motor skills diminish, you get tunnel vision and audio exclusion.  Force yourself to take deep breaths, get oxygen to your brain and calm down.  Breathe. Keep your finger off the trigger and straight along the frame until you need to come up on target and engage. Breathe some more.


Now that you and your family are in a controlled area call for backup.  Just like a cop would, you want the good guys coming to help you.  Call 911 and tell them your situation.  Tell the dispatcher you are the homeowner and you are armed and describe what you are wearing.  


Now you can announce your presence and make your demands on the intruder. Take a deep breath and announce with command authority, "STOP!  DO NOT MOVE!  IF YOU MOVE YOU WILL BE SHOT!  I'VE CALLED 911 AND THE POLICE ARE ON THEIR WAY.  SLOWLY TURN AROUND AWAY FROM ME AND GET ON THE FLOOR!  


Do not try and impersonate a police officer by saying "FREEZE! POLICE!"  Or try and be cute and say what you really said was, "FREEZE, PUL-EEZE!" (Don't laugh, I've seen an instructor advocate this).  Resist the strong temptation to yell, "SHOW ME YOUR HANDS".  I've seen countless students doing in role playing.  You are at a disadvantage in reaction time if he produces a firearm.  You've commanded him to move his hands, you are expecting him to move his hands and when he does, you will be behind the curve to react if he has a gun in his hands.


After you've verbally challenged the intruder a million variables can happen.  The bad guy can turn and run out the door.  He can yell back at you, "I've got a gun too". He can knock himself out trying to run out a closed sliding glass door.  He can fire a shot in your direction.  He can ignore you. Or he could actually comply with your commands.  All of these things have happened in real situations. 


That's why you want to already have a position that you can control, because you really don't have any control over him at all.  Best case, he turns and runs out of the house.  Worst case, he charges you or challenges you by walking your way.  It seems reasonable to assume that someone who has invaded your house and knows you are armed most likely wishes ill intent on you if they confront or charge you.  You need to make the decision now if you can or cannot actually use deadly force against someone like that.


In either case, do not voluntarily give up your superior position unless you are forced to.  Defending is easier than attacking.  Use your cover to protect you.  Whether the bad guy leaves or forces you to defend yourself, do not come out from your cover until the cops arrive.  Do not feel that you need to rush out and somehow detain the bad guy. What are you going to do?  Tie him up with your belt?  Wrestle him in your jammies? Keep the distance that the handgun provides you as you wait for the cops. 


Wait for the responding officers to announce their presence.  Yell back where you are and lay down your handgun. Don't be surprised if you are taken to the floor by the cops, frisked and handcuffed.  Hey, they are as jacked up as you are with the prospect of gunplay in an unfamiliar house and they don't know if you really are the good guy.  Don't take it personally.


If you are serious about this scenario then I need to advise you to get a flashlight.  Either a handheld light or a weapon-mounted light.  One of the four basic rules of firearms safety relates to being able to identify your target and it will certainly be one of the things you'll be asked about at your trial if you have to shoot the guy.  I'm talking about a white light, not a laser sight.  You must be able to SEE your target so you can identify that it is truly a bad guy and not your teenaged son or knuckleheaded brother-in-law.  While a laser sight might be able to help you shoot more accurately in the dark, it does nothing to help you see what you are shooting.  You might change your mind about shooting the intruder if you see that it's really the 13-year old kid that lives down the street and he's trying to steal your XBox 360. Or, as noted in the item above, if the "intruder" actually is a confused old-man who wandered into your house through the open garage door that you forgot to close.


You don't mention what type of handgun you have, but it needs to be in good working order and maintained for reliability.  Also, use factory ammo, not some sort of reload or handload.  Also, keep your magazines full, minus one round.


As you can tell, this scenario holds countless variables, is extremely complicated and has no simple answer.  Best advice, get firearms training related to this topic and also contact an attorney who is knowledgeable about the use of force in your state.


Keep training and stay safe.


Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Gun and Ammo Sales Surge

This news item is no surprise if you've been anywhere looking to purchase ammo lately.

According to today's Wall Street Journal:

"Purchases of guns and ammunition are surging across the country. Nearly four million background checks -- a key measure of sales because they are required at the purchase of a gun from a federally licensed seller -- were performed in the first three months of 2009. That is a 27% increase over the same period a year earlier, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation."

Labels: , ,